Hallo, padawan12 hat gesagt: // padawan12 wrote:
Cool! We've discovered something "very wrong".
Maybe not, read on.
Here I get
number bcalc ecalc bcplx ecplx
4 70 80 110 290 8 140 160 210 560 16 260 330 430 1130 32 560 660 1070 2300 64 1220 1490 3250 4720
Hm, you're right, with such small numbers I actually also get better results for the builtins. I was only testing bigger numbers at first.
With a growing number of test objects I get a huge lead for [expr]. Here are some of my statistics (on a much faster machine):
num bcplx ecplx
128 720 1170 256 2780 2320 512 10430 5800
Now I'm wondering, if something became "very wrong" with [expr] ...
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__