Hi,
actually wrap~ seems really buggy. Maybe its the nature of its concept, anyway my fix is to wrap wrap~ into [wrap-switch~] that has a sig~ connected to the wrap~ inlet and then a [r wrapswitch]. Now you can change the wrapping on all wrap~´s just by sending 0,1 or even 2 to [r wrapswitch].
Maybe I´m just beeing neurotic but there is some kind of very incosistent bug, maybe some kind of overflow. I´ll try once more to track it.
mvh/"the other" Steffen (Leve Poulsen) on XP Pd version 0.40-2
Frank Barknecht skrev:
Hallo, Claude Heiland-Allen hat gesagt: // Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
Hmm, isn't the second [wrap~] redundant anyway?
Theoretically yes, but practically it seems that adding the second wrap~ after wrap~ is exactly what fixes the problem!
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2007-05/049886.html
Hope this helps...
Ah, it's that one. Okay, I'll add one then.
Ciao