/Björn

On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Lorenzo Sutton <lsutton@libero.it> wrote:

wops. this was meant for the list...

On 08/10/2011 22:21, Björn Eriksson wrote:

Here attached a try to use less objects... ended up with 9 objects.

Nice!
But... it's not vanilla (I think) due to the [sin~] :-)

So.. I wasn't thinking of using (pseudo)randomness (noise)... Otherwise one could do something like the attached.. (7 objects including [dac~])

Lorenzo

/Björn Eriksson

On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Lorenzo Sutton <lsutton@libero.it
<mailto:lsutton@libero.it>> wrote:

Hey Chris,

Thanks for this really interesting!

On 07/10/2011 14:25, Chris McCormick wrote:

<http://countercomplex.__blogspot.com/2011/10/__algorithmic-symphonies-from-__one-line-of.html

<http://countercomplex.blogspot.com/2011/10/algorithmic-symphonies-from-one-line-of.html>>

Surely we can do stuff like this in Pd?

Smallest Pd patch that makes an interesting tune?

Depending on your definition of 'interesting' I made these two. I
guess they can be considered rather minimal (under 16 objects per
patch excluding comments and including [dac~]...)
The principle is basically the same in both patches.

Lorenzo.

Chris.

-------------------
http://mccormick.cx

_________________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at <mailto:Pd-list@iem.at> mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->

http://lists.puredata.info/__listinfo/pd-list
<http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list>

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at <mailto:Pd-list@iem.at> mailing list

UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list