ahh yes that definition of RJDJ is clear now...
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 10:53:37 +0000I wouldn't say it's a port of of Pd, not as an application.
ALAN BROOKER <alan.brooker2010@gmail.com> wrote:
> Regarding ugly plan: Is app store 'lock-in' any different from apple's usual
> hardware' lock in' for laptops/desktops? Pd still runs on those platforms so
> why not port ipad, ipod, iphone upud, ipid etc?
>
> In any case isnt RJDJ the port for Pd to this platform anyway ? I could be
> wrong- not 100%
It's a port of Pd to support a specific application class
with its own interfaces.
The GUI for Pd on a tablet would be quite different anyway,
to take advantage of that device's touch gestures, a direct
port of the keyboard oriented interface would miss an opportunity.
Regarding Apple, who are only one manufacturer of mobile
and tablet devices; I think this is a moral issue that can
be easily settled by watching this famous advertisement,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OYecfV3ubP8
and comparing the stance implied there with their position
25 years later.
--
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Derek Holzer <derek@umatic.nl> wrote:
>
> > But kids have such a shorter attention span these days....
> >
> > D.
> >
> >
> > On 1/8/11 4:29 AM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> >
> > BTW, the nineties had another site for that, which had a lot more text,
> >> from which you could actually learn, instead of OMG FAIL.
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > ::: derek holzer ::: http://macumbista.net :::
> > ---Oblique Strategy # 46:
> > "Disconnect from desire"
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> >
Andy Farnell <padawan12@obiwannabe.co.uk>
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list