Hi Jeremiah,
I'm not sure what kind of feature you're describing.  Is it that you want a long running Pd instance 
on the rpi with the ability to connect/disconnect a _single_ GUI at will?




On Tuesday, September 13, 2016 6:46 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig@iem.at> wrote:


On 09/13/2016 09:24 AM, Jeremiah Rose wrote:
> Do you think it's liakely that such a patch would be accepted by the
> maintainer?

which maintainer?

what i'm talking about is a middleware software (a standalone proxy),
that handles the connections from both Pd-core and Pd-gui.
this is possible.
it has already been done (in a different context  -"peer data").
back then i implemented the middleware as a Pd-patch.
there is no maintainer who could accept anything.

if you are talking about modifying ("patching") the Pd-core so it would
allow dis/connections from an independently started Pd-GUI, then I am
the wrong person to ask: miller reads this list, so you could ask him
directly.

btw, i seem to remember that at miller's last visit to Graz we talked
about this very feature and he seemed to be in favour.
so i guess, if a patch against Pd-core follows the coding style and is
"not very" intrusive, chances are high that it might get included.

gmards

IOhannes


_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list