if you want to use pd~ to for example render a GEM patch you need to switch on dsp in the subprocess at least for a moment.
I don't think you need to do this (anymore). Control objects work fine without DSP being turned on in the subprocess, like the documentation says.
@iftah, some more ideas:
- make sure DSP is turned on in the parent process (even if the subprocess doesn't process audio)
- make that the subprocess could really load the patch (verify with the GUI)
- in the subprocess, send a message to [stdout] with [loadbang] and check if you receive it in the parent process
- send a message to the subprocess and check if it is properly received, e.g. by sending it back to [stdout]
Christof
Gesendet: Montag, 16. September 2019 um 12:35 Uhr Von: "Max" abonnements@revolwear.com An: pd-list@lists.iem.at Betreff: Re: [PD] pd~ and rpi
I remember this bug. if you want to use pd~ to for example render a GEM patch you need to switch on dsp in the subprocess at least for a moment. A simple
[loadbang] | [; pd dsp 1(
[loadbang] | [delay 1000] | [; pd dsp 0(
in the subprocess will make it work. I'm not sure if or when this was fixed, but I think it was at some point.
On 15.09.19 18:57, iftah gabbai wrote:
hello list, its my first email ever so i really hope i do the guidelines justice, i just missed the part about the gmail issue so chaned my adress to @googlemail , apologies if u got this email twice :)
i tried searching the list and google and couldn’t find too much info so i try here: im attempting to use (pd~) in a patch in order to use multicore processing on my rpi 3b+. it works fine on my mac using pd 0.50 but does not seem to work on my rpi running strech lite headless and pd 0.47. the closest i got is to get it to print info out of stdout and this is happening only when i start the dsp in the sub process which kinda contradicts the documantaion. i tested also using atest patch which is just an osc~ connected to a dac~ in the sub process but still no luck. i wonder if anyone ever got this to work? is it related to 0.47 and should i go thru the trouble of compiling / installing a newer version since 0.47 is the latest version available for strech lite as far as i understated?
thank you very much
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list