Hi Ed,

The prototype of your perform method is wrong. You should have something like:

static t_int *wrap_overshoot_tilde_perform( t_int *w)

{

    t_wrap_overshoot_tilde *x = (t_wrap_overshoot_tilde *)(w[1]);

    t_sample *in  = (t_sample *)(w[2]);

    t_sample *out = (t_sample *)(w[3]);

    t_int n       = (t_int)(w[4]);

    ...

    return w+5;

}

and the dsp_add method should be called like this:

dsp_add((t_perfroutine)wrap_ overshoot_tilde_perform, 4, (t_int)x, (t_int)sp[0]->s_vec, (t_int)sp[1]->s_vec, (t_int)sp[0]->s_n);

About what you want to do, I would like to help but I'm not sure to understand. I understand that you want that your object performs at the end of the DSP chain (end of the audio block) on a signal that should be computed previously in the DSP chain but as we all know only the Matthew McConaughey from Interstellar has this power :).

Cheers,

Pierre

2016-09-29 12:00 GMT+02:00 Ed Kelly via Pd-dev <pd-dev@lists.iem.at>:

Hey list,

I'm tearing my hair out trying to re-write the wrap~ object, so that it doesn't wrap instantly but waits until the end of the audio block to wrap~ the signal. I hope you understand.

This is so that control-rate messages sent to another object further down the signal-path have a chance to catch up, and eliminate clicks due to the end-of-block delay for control messages.

The idea is that wrap_overshoot~ will not wrap until the end of the block. This is a really tech-y problem, but I've tried variables and clocks. Everything seems to segfault on me.

?????

Lots of love,

Ed

PS if this works you'll all be able to use it during and after pdcon16~

______________________________ _________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@lists.iem.at
https://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-dev