It partially worked. It seems to be something ALMOST there, but I got an error message. I posted a few days ago. But it's definitely the best solution right now

On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Roman Haefeli <reduzent@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 09:40 +0200, Leandro da Mota Damasceno wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> I would like to apologize for the private emails. it's that when I
> reply to the messages they go to the author, not the list. Weird.
> that's not what happens in other mailing lists...
>
>
> So, I have tried to fix the standalone as jasch suggested, but i got
> all sorts of error messages. I would have to work almost from scratch
> and if my knowledge on PD is still in beginner level, my knowledge of
> max/MSP is almost null. Unfortunately, I'm on a deadline to have this
> thing working, so I need a workaround by next week.
>
>
> So right now, I'd rather not mess with the standalone and working on a
> new version by myself in a few weeks from now. Martin, I can send you
> the patch, but I'm afraid it won't be any helpful for this case, since
> it depends on dating coming from the standalone. I can give it to you,
> of course, if you want. But I think it's pretty much what has been
> described here. The best solution for now I think would be to have a
> way to get ordinary messages through udp. No OSC standards.
>

Sorry in case I missed it, but did the abstraction I sent you recently
not work? I don't think, that it should be too difficult to find a way
to deal with the faulty OSC messages in Pd (so that you don't have to
touch the standalone max/msp patch).

Roman