Hi there,
I am not so terribly into that right now..
Just an idea.
What if you just shift the table and write it to a second one...
silly probably...
just an idea
Am 07.05.2007 um 20:25 schrieb Derek Holzer:
Sorry! Should read:
Yes, correct. If I have a table that's 100 places long, and I set the offset to 95 and the length to 30, I would like to get a loop that starts at 95 and when it reaches 100, continue playing at 0 up to 25. The next loop would then begin again at 95 and wrap around through
0 to 25, und so weiter.apologies, d.
Derek Holzer wrote:
Yes, correct. If I have a table that's 100 places long, and I set the offset to 95 and the length to 25, I would like to get a loop that starts at 95 and when it reaches 100, continue playing at 0 up to 25. The next loop would then begin again at 95 and wrap around through
0 to 25, und so weiter.best, d.
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Ah, sorry: I now read, that you don't want to start at the beginning of the sample but at the offset-point again. Then some more math is needed, I'll give it a shot a bit later.
-- derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl ---Oblique Strategy # 175: "What are the sections sections of? Imagine a caterpillar moving"
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list