Why not just use a phasor~ per rate~ and then have the frequency of all them controlled by the same number box?

.hc

On Dec 6, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote:

copy this patch http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6P4Ezz9aWa8&feature=plcp


On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Simon Iten <itensimon@gmail.com> wrote:

What are you trying to accomplish?

On Dec 6, 2012 2:48 PM, "Alexandros Drymonitis" <adrcki@gmail.com> wrote:
How can one implement Max's [rate~] in Pd? [rate~] takes a signal from a [phasor~] and according to its argument it scales the frequency (roughly speaking). So

[phasor~ 1]
|
[rate~ 1.5]

will actually give a [phasor~ 1.5]. I thought of [wrap] but that won't do the trick with non-integers.
Any ideas?

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list