Just checking out SCALA, it's the standard scales format I see. So, does [tunetof] embed thousands of scales in a table like my thing or do you load them on demand through the py script? Which is better in your opinion? I was happy to see that the 1000 or so from CLM fit happily into < 64k even when packed very clumbsily. The only rough edge so far is that scales are variable length, some are just 4 or 5 notes and others run up over many octaves.
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:04:45 +0200 Frank Barknecht fbar@footils.org wrote:
Hallo, padawan12 hat gesagt: // padawan12 wrote:
I don't have a musical enough ear to have a clue whether this does entirely what it's supposed to. Any ideas? Has this been done before? To be proper I think it needs to work on the original integer ratio data so it computes at the accuracy of the machine running it.
I did something similar, but much simpler, with [tunetof], which is a replacement for [mtof] using different intonations. The intonations are specified as a simple table which maps "notes" to frequencies. These tables can be generated from tuning files in Scala's file format using a Python script supplied with [tunetof]. Both are available in CVS at /abstractions/footils/tunetof/
[1] http://www.xs4all.nl/~huygensf/scala/scl_format.html
Ciao
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list