certainly you could call it "untrustworthy" though...cos there's no way of telling creation order from the GUI, and cut and paste or other re-patching is liable to open your patch to changes which would re-order things. 

for all intents and purposes, you're best off thinking of it as totally random. 

On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Joe White <white.joe4@gmail.com> wrote:
It might be a bit misleading to call this behaviour 'undefined'. 

As Alexandre points out, control execution is defined by the order the connections appear in the netlist and so have reliable results each time the patch is run.

It's not really the same problem you have in other languages where there is a runtime ambiguity.

And is probably more an issue with the Pd environment UI than the language specification.

Cheers,
Joe

On 7 September 2015 at 19:15, IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig@iem.at> wrote:
On 09/07/2015 08:01 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> i hope this explains it.

forgot this.

gfmards
IOhannes

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list



_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list