And as for the 'long overdue', there's this fix that's been bugging me since Pd 0.46 when I first reported it that really complicates some patches with delay interactions https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/708

Em ter., 23 de nov. de 2021 às 17:10, Alexandre Torres Porres <porres@gmail.com> escreveu:
and now for things we also usually ask in response to test release announcements :) 

I'm just curious on why this feature has been held for so long since it's been flagged for inclusion back in the 0.49 release (and now 0.52), it's the addition of "$0" for messages, seems like there's something still "wrong" with it? => https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/347 I ask because I've been improving the documentation of handling "$0" in Pd, and it'd be much easier with it. 

I also got a couple of new PRs that promote quick/minor changes to code that I consider 'bug fixes' from a documentation point of view: 1) Get rid of useless [bang~] inlet (https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/1471) cause I don't think it makes sense to document that it has no functionality (and this won't break any patches); 2) add bang method to [atan2] (https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/1465), because all other similar math/binary operators do this and it's just harder and more confusing to document a special inconsistent case. This is specially needed now that I'm adding references subpatches with info on i/olets and methods.

cheers

Em ter., 23 de nov. de 2021 às 15:29, Antoine Rousseau <antoine@metalu.net> escreveu:
leave the shortcuts as they were and use cmd+6 for the new list atom
 
+1

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list