On 2010-11-29 14:45, tim vets wrote:
do I interpret it correct if I assume that a solution for [tabread~]-ing big files without quality loss would be to make a counter and split one big [line~] movement into small segments ?
something like:
[metro 100] | [f]X[+ 4410] | [s adder]
and
[r adder] | [t b f] | | [0, 4410 100( | | / [line~] / | ______ / [+~]
??? you are still hitting the problem that the output of [+~] has probably to little precision.
your patch will thus not give you any benefit.
| [tabread~]
i was _not_ talking about [tabread~] but about [tabplay~]
[bang( | [tabplay~]
alternatively you can use the send inlet (message!) of [tabread4~] for better precision. the help-patch directs you to B15.tabread4~-onset.pd
msdfrt# IOhannes