Subject: Re: [PD] consolidate backward- and MaxMSP compatibility in Cyclone (was: Purpose of Cyclone)
Date: December 22, 2015 at 4:46:29 PM MST
If I may make a suggestion - when I find that an object isn't terriblywell designed (for example my own qlist :) I make another one, with anothername, that does the job better (text).cheersMillerOn Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 08:51:03PM -0200, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:Well, newer patches with newer functionalities not working in older
versions is how things go anyway, right? Vanilla 0-46 patches don't run in
0.45 and so on... there's no way around that I guess.
the dual outlet layout with message left and
signal right is rather unusual.
But I think it's also simpler and more straightforward than introducing
flags, arguments and all. It might be unusual, but there are already some
objects with similar design, I actually thought of that because of
[sampstoms~] and [mstosamps~] - it'd be basically the same design.
cheers