On Sun, 2007-06-17 at 11:10 +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 18:06 +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote:
oops, i thought, they are done in plain pd. [bp2~] is abstraction from iemabs based on [filter~], which is either in iemlib1 or iemlib2. but since these abs are intended to be included into pd-extended, it shouldn't be a problem, that [bp2~] is used.
It also still sounds okay, though different, if replaced with [bp~].
yeah, but definitely not like the original 808 clap [1]. i am bit finical about that ;-) assuming i want to keep [bp2~], would it be better to replace it by [iemlib/bp2~] to make it work out of the box in pd-extended, right?
Then it won't work for people who have iemlib installed somewhere else and/or load it as a library.
i thought, we do that effort to include the result into pd-extended? if that is the case, shouldn't we focus on make it working there first?
You could built your own bp2~ using elementary filters.
yeah, i personally would prefer that way, but i know too little about filterdesign to implement it myself.
since it is meant to be in pd-extended anyway, what speaks against using externals here?
roman
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de