I would hope forward secrecy would put a dent in that plan, but
I'm not sure.
-Jonathan
On Monday, June 6, 2016 2:36 PM, Andy Farnell <padawan12@obiwannabe.co.uk> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 04:03:28PM +0000, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > > of a signal we could not possibly sample under Nyquist restrictions. > But a public-facing server would regularly be "tweeting", no?