of messages through the first inlet like that can be seen in Miller's multi pickup guitar effects monster andMaking everything FUDI friendly with super neat message boxes and routingThat can be solved once the controls are broke free from the presets and DSP.Also some discussion in this list.Here is a thread about it. http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/5724/dollar-signs-in-objects-and-messagescomplicated for the controls that have their properties change at runtime.and receive names dynamically. I guess it works for controls that are not dynamic but gets reallySo Instead of making more controls I tried to reduce the amount of controls by changing the sendthat offsets by a floating point. At this point of development it was found that there were way too manyThere are 2 banks of oscillators and only one uses this kind of control, the other is just a regular dialknob yet instead of continuous or cents adjustment it allows an offset based on the scale.The scales all end up in an frequency ratio list. So the knob is used to like the "tune" or "pitch"way in steps of the scale. It doesn't matter if the intervals are specified in cents ,JI,or an edo.the number of intervals the scale has per equivalence interval or what I like to call the xTaveAnother is a dial or knob that is quantized and the range changes depending onso you can have 1s,3s, 10s, and 30s controls. This is dynamic controls.For instance there are toggles that change the range of the envelope ADR controlsthat there are some pretty nifty things going on with the view.Everything is available for me to break the view away from the DSP its justthe tcl controls as MVC then making the controls a part of the preset machine.My struggles with it are not really limitations of pd.It's the way I have went about modelling a polyphonic synthesizer and using
, it is used to offset the frequency in a quantitative
controls and being attached to the presets as well as the synthesizer's realtime adjustments.
patch repository or MAX/MSP XFM~ will be quite the task. Those are great examples of how patching should be.Branching away from puredata?Using javascript and the web browser dynamic html to make controls for the fractal sequencer.As well as a xenharmonic sequencer, a Moments of Symmetry(Erv Wilson) matrix generatorto go along with Erv's mosedo.pdf There are 2 versions of it , one without the FUDI to pd stuff
https://ia601408.us.archive.org/1/items/mosedo.html/mosedo.html?p=17&g=7 , the other with and another expected soonthat works with any generator. The edo MOS are finite and are the "Well Formed" set of MOS,Finally Andrew Milne figured out how to calculate the cardinalities without using continued fractions or brute force.So now it is quick to generate the non rational MOS alongside the closest approximating "Well Formed" MOS using verysimple code which took forever to even comprehend on paper with pencil. Things like this are complex for me with pdNow that the algorithm is coded up in javascript a pd version would be simpler to make however , having this part ofthe puzzle in the browser will make it easier for a general audience to use.The new text object makes things like a database of modes easy to access in pd and also is easy enoughto implement a user interface with the entire list on a webpage. In pd a simple abstraction that incrementsan index for sets with {p} tones , an index for the modes of sizes {s} , then the index into the modes {m} with
s number of notes within scales having p tones. Example:from14 tone equal modes:
2 3 2 2 3 2 Quasi-equal Hexatonic
2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 Gould Nonatonic
1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Decimal-10
2 3 3 3 3 Godzilla-5
2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Godzilla-9
3 2 2 3 2 2 Hedgehog-6
1 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 Hedgehog-8
3 3 2 3 3 Semaphore-5
1 2 3 2 1 2 3 Superpelog-Pelog
1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 Superpelog-9p=14,s=6,
m=0: 2 3 2 2 3 2 Quasi-equal Hexatonic
m=1: 3 2 2 3 2 2 Hedgehog-6For this set it is not too much to cycle through the entire listbut for 12 and 31 edo there are many more modes.Would probably be ok to only divide the entire list up in files withthe all the modes in scales with p tones instead of splitting up the list further.The list was easy to add user interactive <div> tags and mouseover functionsthat send the selected mode to the synthesizer in javascript and html.With the text object the user interface is a little different.It's only a float atom index into the list, a canvas display for the currently selecteditem in the list. , and a bang to send the mode off to where it can be used vs the entire
interactive scrollable list in the browser. Some of the modes are specific to other scalesthat are Just Intonation as well as cents rather than equal division scales.
So from within pd there are abstractions that accept over FUDI a scale in cents as well
as a scale in Just intonation. simply snagging the intervals from the html and inserting theminto the section heading onmouseover function input is all that is needed for FUDICalizationimplementation. With the textobject the scale intervals are easily snaggable with [text get].For the equal division scales an abstraction exists that only needs a message containing
an equivalence interval or "xTave" and number of divisions. for Bohlen Pierce - xTave = 33 and divisions = 13. The text object could contain the entire message on one lineEqualDivision 13 3;and the text that describes it "Bohlen Pierce Equal Divisions" on another line.This is getting simpler now, I think it's a good format for data of this type whichcan describe in different ways , information for the user and the machine.for the modes , since they are all modes and described in the same waythe "mode part of the message neednt be in the text object.Since all the data has a descriptor and informationthe index could simply be the entire list in 2 line pairs.description;data;description;data;
< >next / previous item is easyfor(x=0, x<2,x++)
|[t f f]{float to spigot selects , then float to text get}
[text get]{out to spigot inlets} [select 0][spigot][canvasrx label description([canvas[o][<][>]]redtangled[select 1][ spigot ][r bang( /| /
| /[list]What about dynamic visualization of data that is variable in size as well asvariable element controls like a piano roll midi sequencer?it's being implemented in tcl.how do you do it without tcl and without data structures?Food for thought!Is pure data's entire reason for existence to perplexingly confuse thevirtual parallel patchcordianist?The webpage interface: xensynth/burningship/pdApplet/xensynthcontrol.html
https://archive.org/details/Xensynth10.01What in the Godel Bear does this mean?"Loading the file versus loading the object
There are multiple forms for storing objects on the filesystem, including abstractions, single- and multi-object library files, etc. Then there is the representation of what objects are assigned to which symbols. These don't need to be the same thing. Each patch has its own table of which symbols are attached to which objects, and this can be separate from which objects are actually loaded into memory.
One idea for handling this is to have separate tables of symbols for which object files are loaded, versus which symbols are tied to which objects for a given patch. It seems for this to be workable, there would need to be a "loaded" table, then each patch would generate its table from the loaded table. Then if an object isn't in the loaded table, the loaded table handler would go and try to load it."
https://puredata.info/dev/PdNamespaces
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list