removing pdp/pidip is a bad idea

On 11/23/2010 11:58 AM, John Harrison wrote:
Yves:

It's your code so you get to choose. From my standpoint as an educator, removal of PiDiP from pd-extended is very unfortunate. I hope at some point you reconsider your position.

-John

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:46 AM, ydegoyon@gmail.com <ydegoyon@gmail.com> wrote:

good!!! i'm free to do what i like now!!!

yeh!

sevy

Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

Ok, will do. I also have to remove pidip from Pd-extended based on this license.

.hc

On Nov 23, 2010, at 7:18 AM, ydegoyon@free.fr wrote:

jooo, que espeso ...

i told you 10000 times not to package my stuff,
that i'm happy with the packages of goto10...

so [EOC]


ciao,
sevy


Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:

Hey Lluis and Yves,

I see that puredyne has packaged pidip, so it should be pretty easy to get it into Debian. The only problem is the license. If it was a straight BSD or GPL license, then it would be fine. The problem is this line:

NOT FOR MILITARY OR REPRESSIVE USE !!!

That isn't free according to the Debian Free Software Guidelines.

.hc

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

As we enjoy great advantages from inventions of others, we should be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and this we should do freely and generously. - Benjamin Franklin










----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Programs should be written for people to read, and only incidentally for machines to execute.
- from Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs




_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list