7 May
2006
7 May
'06
6:56 a.m.
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
osc/route osc/pack osc/unpack
I think these should be more descriptive. They don't work exactly the same as the core versions, so they should have different, but similar, names.
Why should namespaces exist if they don't solve name conflicts?
The suffix is fine, but it should be consistent across objects in the lib, like: [osc/packOSC] [osc/unpackOSC] [osc/routeOSC]
those names all contain "osc" twice. if the latter "OSC" can't be removed, then why not removing the leading "osc/" ?
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju | Freelance Digital Arts Engineer, Montréal QC Canada