Hi,
I've never noticed send/receive causing unpredictable execution order. Can someone show me an example of under what circumstances this occurs so I can avoid future head aches?
-- David Shimamoto
Atte André Jensen wrote:
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Yes, it is. ;)
But slightly more tricky is that send/recieve must have the same "problems", but may be more difficult to spot.
indeed, this problem exists.
that is why you should use explicit connections and [trigger] whenever possible.
on the other hand, i do have plans for a [receive] where you could enforce a certain order (similar to [gemhead])
and since we are there: never use [delay] to enforce a certain execution order (it does work, but usually you will get weird (though totally deterministic) results in more complex setups)
fmgasd.r IOhannes
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list