22 Apr
2008
22 Apr
'08
5:23 p.m.
Am 22.04.2008 um 17:02 schrieb Andy Farnell:
Note that I also think, the math objects (abs~, pow~ etc.) should be part of Pd, and probably symbol2list.
Two of us doesn't make a concensus, but I've got the feeling most
would agree.
Me for one, i have really missed pow~ or abs~ but i have been missing
many other things.
I don't see the necessity for the objects you mentioned when they can
be built as abstractions using expr~ within seconds.
How about an appendix to your book with a list of objects you used
that are not included in pd-vanilla and the respective abstractions?
gr~~~