Interesting thread here. Remember it started with "Who's goin' to Piksel05"? (-:
I agree with you Ben.
I think that's a question of doing something you think is good according to your ethics and judgement. Quoting Yves here that said it was once said freedom didn' exist: I'd say freedom is a path rather than a detination. Thus, IMHO if one considers it as the destination it can well be said it doesn't exist. At least that's how I understand it.
Your walk through this path is then guided by your own judgement and ethics. I see discussion as a good thing to ask myself questions about what I'm doing and how I'm doing it. Nothing's obvious here, at least for me...
I really see sharing (ideas, knowledge...) as the key though.
++
Jé
B. Bogart a écrit :
Diversity is the key here, the world should be a pretty good example of the fact that one solution does not work, that is after all the old utopian idea.
The more options the better, the more niches the more the opportunity. This is why monopolies are bad, which are the greatest investors in the crooked American pattent system.
Diversity is nature's law and we should follow it.
b.
Piotr Majdak wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
What does money have to do with it, and what would you replace money with?
Because you wanted to get free hardware and as long as some people have to earn money for their work they want you to pay for that. "It's the economics, stupid!" (B. Clinton).
And, unfortunetaly, I don't have any solution for changing the system we live in :-). But, changing just _one_ rule (free "anything") won't work...
br, Peter
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list