Hi, Andy and how does your system work? Do you have a link?
How many speakers are you using?
I dont need high degree of phase stability , i need to control 50 very cheap speakers. I dont really mind if they dont produce all the frequency range.
If each speaker generate only one frequency , its ok.
I only need to be able to control them (the 50) from the computer, i was thinking, maybe not using sound?
cheers
U.
A question to consider; Do the channels need a high degree
of phase stability?
Fernando is designing for a WFS system here. You may have more
relaxed requirements for a theatre or installation multichannel
system not needing such a degree of correlation.
Using a very simliar approach with jack-udp, but with
asynchronous receivers, chained ethernet, using gumstick
or Raspberry Pi boards with cheap audio USB dongles.
Andy
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 09:16:40AM -0700, Miller Puckette wrote:
> Best solution I've seen so far is by Fernando Lopez-Lezcano -- there's a
> paper in the Linux Audio Conference 2012:
> http://lac.linuxaudio.org/2012/papers/29.pdf
>
> cheers
> miller
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 05:58:50PM +0200, umberto torrez wrote:
> > Hi list, i was wondering which is the best approach for controlling a lots
> > of speakers with pd? 50 ?
> > Is there any hardware or technique that allows to do this and that is not
> > so expensive?
> >
> > any idea?
> >
> > Umberto.
>