i guess you misunderstood me. i understood that you won't code the
features yourself;
how would a "request for a feature" be different from a question of
"whether this 'can' be done (hopefully by someone else who feels like
this is indeed a good idea and who has the skills to implement them)",
apart from the level of politeness?

Yes, you are right. I understand what you said. I reply too fast and in the end was just a feeling that I needed to share with you lol

> There is another thing that don't work with dynamically created objects that
> is the [loadbang] object.

please read the archives on this topic (there are numerous search
interfaces to this mailinglist, one of them being at
http://lists.puredata.info/serach/Pd-list)
the last time, this question popped up on 23rd february, so you might
already have been subscribed to the list.
in short: this is a feature, not a bug

I was already subscribed but turned the e-mail receiving off because I was a little away of pd for some time.
Anyway my work is now complete thanks to you guys. I apreciated the help very much and and working with Pd is becoming a more and more pleasing thing to do.