salut Cyrille,
Maybe the following will be helpful.
(MacBook Pro, 2.4 GHz Core 2 duo, OS 10.5.1, 2GB ram)
/Applications/Pd-0.40.3-extended-20071117.app running with no patch open:
PID COMMAND %CPU TIME #TH #PRTS #MREGS RPRVT RSHRD RSIZE VSIZE
4784 pd 21.3% 0:37.54 6 98 288 4444K 4152K 12M 40
/Applications/Pd-0.40.3-extended-20071117.app with example pmpd #22 open
and gemwin open still not running:
PID COMMAND %CPU TIME #TH #PRTS #MREGS RPRVT RSHRD RSIZE VSIZE
4784 pd 23.5% 2:09.90 6 129 422 10M 16M 23M 414M
/Applications/Pd-0.40.3-extended-20071117.app with example pmpd #22 open
and running:
PID COMMAND %CPU TIME #TH #PRTS #MREGS RPRVT RSHRD RSIZE VSIZE
4784 pd 39.1% 3:32.09 6 129 423 11M 13M 23M 414M
Andrew
> i just made a performance test on osX, using pmpd exemple 22 (i had
> similar
> problem with other patch, this is just an exemple)
>
> with pd extended, or pd/Gem and pmpd compiled from cvs, this patch use
> about
> 40% CPU on a macbook pro 2.33Ghz.
>
> on my computer (dual core 2Ghz), it use about 22% (in both case, % are
> mesure for only 1 CPU : both computer are dual core)
> i did not do any thing special in my computer to optimise compilation,
> nor in the macbook.
>
> could anyone with a macbook pro could test this patch and tell me the
> CPU used?