hi
nullpointer schrieb:
> I'm running win95 with a pentium2 mmx
> I can change the audiobuffersize e.t.c. but pd doesn't even seem to
> recognise the
> -noresync flag
> if i run
> pd -noresync
>
> it just shows the help page like ou have made an error..
> Do you not use the noresync flag?
>
> Im running Pd version 0.32P1
> which i think is the most recent... (let me know if not)
it is a problem of the newer versions (I think since 0.32). i tried
0.32p and couldnŽt get sound...
in 0.30 (which i use) resyncinc is done automatically and works fine. (i
think in 0.32p itŽs also done automatically, but does not work fine)
the new version ignores the resync/noresync-flag, i also think so.
> Are you using a Gina card too? If so maybe my gina drivers are old or
> something.
> The gina card appears as several output buses on the windows mm control
> panel but i've been using it with cubase fine for a year or so.
> Its using a driver version
> vechogal.vxd 4.03.0
> mmdevldr.vxd 4.00.950
there are newer versions (5.02.0)
but thy donŽt solve the problem.
> All I need really is for pd to be able to send to the different outputs on
> my card so i can stick the channels through a desk. Have you managed to get
> this working..
i think for the moment the only possibility is to download older
version. (i can put it some where for you, if its necessary.
sme.
>
> Sorry to pester.
> Thanks
>
> Tom
> ________________________________________________________
> C:\AUTOEXEC.BAT
> C:\REM [Header]
> C:\>
> C:\>PATH=C:\PERL\BIN;C:\WINDOWS\COMMAND;\C:jdk1.2.2\bin
> ________________________________________________________
>
> http://www.nullpointer.co.uk
> (all suffixes enabled)
>hi!
>to start use the command
>"pd -audiobuf 200 -soundoutdev 1 -outchannels 8"
>and in a patch you determine the outlet by "dac~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8"
>windows is slow (buffer), actually you should not need to recompile pd
yeah,, i tried that...
but pd tries to sync all outchannels and then closes them all.
I though that noresync would solve this but the flag doesn't seem to even be
read by pd..
It just throws up the help report instead...
Tom
________________________________________________________
C:\AUTOEXEC.BAT
C:\REM [Header]
C:\>
C:\>PATH=C:\PERL\BIN;C:\WINDOWS\COMMAND;\C:jdk1.2.2\bin
________________________________________________________
http://www.nullpointer.co.uk
(all suffixes enabled)
-----Original Message-----
From: smedge <marius(a)teleweb.at>
To: nullpointer <nullpointer(a)odessadesign.co.uk>
Cc: pd-list(a)iem.kug.ac.at <pd-list(a)iem.kug.ac.at>
Date: 28 February 2001 17:42
Subject: Re: noresync... and compilation on win 95
>hi!
>to start use the command
>"pd -audiobuf 200 -soundoutdev 1 -outchannels 8"
>and in a patch you determine the outlet by "dac~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8"
>windows is slow (buffer), actually you should not need to recompile pd.
>sme.
>
>nullpointer schrieb:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've managed to get pd running on win95 platform and using a event
>> electronics gina card for output. However when I try to run pd to select
all
>> the outputs on the card (8 outputs) it connects to them ok but then goes
mad
>> trying to sync them and eventually closes them all. I tried with the
>> noresync flag but to no avail.. the app doesn't even seem to respond to
>> either the no resync or the resync flag.. even when used on their own you
>> just get the pd commandline help return...
>> Anyone help ?
>>
>> Also I'm trying to recompile pd under win 95 on visual studio 5 but i'm
>> having difficulties, I'm not sure how to define the project to compile
for
>> 95 and whether I could get rid of some of the other platform files for my
95
>> compile...I don't even want to recompile really, I am interested in
writing
>> an extension, but the docs say that extensions compiled under visual
studio
>> 5 wont run woth the binary of pd...
>> Anyone help?
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> Tom Betts
>> nullpointer
>> ________________________________________________________
>> C:\AUTOEXEC.BAT
>> C:\REM [Header]
>> C:\>
>> C:\>PATH=C:\PERL\BIN;C:\WINDOWS\COMMAND;\C:jdk1.2.2\bin
>> ________________________________________________________
>>
>> http://www.nullpointer.co.uk
>> (all suffixes enabled)
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Uta <uta(a)acm.org>
>> To: pd-list(a)iem.kug.ac.at <pd-list(a)iem.kug.ac.at>
>> Date: 28 February 2001 00:37
>> Subject: Re: pure-data.org, pd faq
>>
>> >Dear pd-list,
>> >
>> >jfm3 <jfm3(a)mortmain.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> registered the pure-data.org domain
>> >> www.pure-data.org will never have commercial advertisements
>> >> wrote the pd faq
>> >> contributions, corrections, and flames are more than welcome
>> >>
>> >> (jfm3)
>> >
>> >This is great!
>> >
>> >I translated this FAQ into Japanese.
>> >And here is the page I wrote.
>> >http://www.sfc.keio.ac.jp/~t99685yn/pd/pure_data.htm
>> >
>> >If there is a ploblem about this page(both something legal matter,
>> > or its translation), please inform me.
>> >
>> >Thanks.
>> >
>> >Uta.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>