hi everyone
i once posted a bug to the tracker and it still appears to be there in version 0.42.3.
since this bug is kind of viral, so that it corrupts patches invisibly and without being noticed by the author, and also since quite some of my own patches got affected by that bug, i would like to ask to raise the priority of this one.
BEWARE: everyone, who was working on patches in 0.42.X, that contain abstractions containing [declare]'s is most likely affected, or i should rather say: infected.
read the description here: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2251387&gro...
roman
___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
Yo, I've been meaning to mention forever that there's a similar issue with datastructures. Save a datastructure-using patch as an abstraction, instantiate it in a parent patch, save the parent, and you'll see template definitions from the child abstraction in the parent. I'll make another bug report for that...
Best Luke
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Roman Haefeli reduzierer@yahoo.de wrote:
hi everyone
i once posted a bug to the tracker and it still appears to be there in version 0.42.3.
since this bug is kind of viral, so that it corrupts patches invisibly and without being noticed by the author, and also since quite some of my own patches got affected by that bug, i would like to ask to raise the priority of this one.
BEWARE: everyone, who was working on patches in 0.42.X, that contain abstractions containing [declare]'s is most likely affected, or i should rather say: infected.
read the description here: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2251387&gro...
roman
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
Oops... I'd better fix that one.
I'm still not sure how to deal with "declares" inside abstractions, on the other hand.
cheers Miller
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 05:39:34PM -0800, Luke Iannini wrote:
Yo, I've been meaning to mention forever that there's a similar issue with datastructures. Save a datastructure-using patch as an abstraction, instantiate it in a parent patch, save the parent, and you'll see template definitions from the child abstraction in the parent. I'll make another bug report for that...
Best Luke
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Roman Haefeli reduzierer@yahoo.de wrote:
hi everyone
i once posted a bug to the tracker and it still appears to be there in version 0.42.3.
since this bug is kind of viral, so that it corrupts patches invisibly and without being noticed by the author, and also since quite some of my own patches got affected by that bug, i would like to ask to raise the priority of this one.
BEWARE: everyone, who was working on patches in 0.42.X, that contain abstractions containing [declare]'s is most likely affected, or i should rather say: infected.
read the description here: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2251387&gro...
roman
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
Yugh, this one is still going : ( (in 0.42.5 and 0.43)
It's basically impossible to use declare/import because of this – it's actually worse than Roman explained, because the [declare] spam goes in not just the direct parent but in /every/ parent, getting worse and worse until the top patch has 1000+ lines in it.
(I'd add a comment on sourceforge but didn't see the option)
Very best Luke
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Miller Puckette mpuckett@imusic1.ucsd.edu wrote:
Oops... I'd better fix that one.
I'm still not sure how to deal with "declares" inside abstractions, on the other hand.
cheers Miller
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 05:39:34PM -0800, Luke Iannini wrote:
Yo, I've been meaning to mention forever that there's a similar issue with datastructures. Save a datastructure-using patch as an abstraction, instantiate it in a parent patch, save the parent, and you'll see template definitions from the child abstraction in the parent. I'll make another bug report for that...
Best Luke
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Roman Haefeli reduzierer@yahoo.de wrote:
hi everyone
i once posted a bug to the tracker and it still appears to be there in version 0.42.3.
since this bug is kind of viral, so that it corrupts patches invisibly and without being noticed by the author, and also since quite some of my own patches got affected by that bug, i would like to ask to raise the priority of this one.
BEWARE: everyone, who was working on patches in 0.42.X, that contain abstractions containing [declare]'s is most likely affected, or i should rather say: infected.
read the description here: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2251387&gro...
roman
Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http://messenger.yahoo.de
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
-
Luke Iannini -
Miller Puckette -
Roman Haefeli