On Nov 3, 2020, at 6:04 PM, pd-dev-request@lists.iem.at wrote:
Message: 2 Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 18:03:59 +0100 From: IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig@iem.at mailto:zmoelnig@iem.at> To: pd-dev@lists.iem.at mailto:pd-dev@lists.iem.at Subject: Re: [PD-dev] [PD] [PD-announce] Pd 0.513 test5 released Message-ID: <33E1D9D9-D44A-46DE-B598-B6DD3B49E6C4@iem.at mailto:33E1D9D9-D44A-46DE-B598-B6DD3B49E6C4@iem.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Am 3. November 2020 15:37:38 MEZ schrieb Dan Wilcox <danomatika@gmail.com mailto:danomatika@gmail.com>:
Main point is that the 64 bit build needs the 64 bit Tk.
sorry for being dumb, but: why?
Why not?
I agree that its probably preferred to have matching architectures between Pd-core and Pd-GUI, but is it a requirement?
I would say yes.
afaict the problem lucarda is describing comes mostly from the fact that wish.exe and pdfontloader.dll have different archs. (or is this what you were saying).
Yes, that's what I was saying. If previous versions of the windows 64 bit build worked fine with a 64 bit pdfontloader, then it's because Pd game with a 64 bit tk, so it follows that is what's needed in this case.
-------- Dan Wilcox @danomatika http://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com/ robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com/
I agree that its probably preferred to have matching architectures between Pd-core and Pd-GUI, but is it a requirement?
I would say yes.
Obviously, the wish app can have a different architecture than the core. The only requirement is that the pdfontloader library has the same architecture as the wish app.
But I agree it's good practice not to mix 64-bit and 32-bit software within a single application, unless there are compelling reasons.
Christof
On 03.11.2020 19:02, Dan Wilcox wrote:
On Nov 3, 2020, at 6:04 PM, pd-dev-request@lists.iem.at mailto:pd-dev-request@lists.iem.at wrote:
Message: 2 Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 18:03:59 +0100 From: IOhannes m zmölnig <zmoelnig@iem.at mailto:zmoelnig@iem.at> To:pd-dev@lists.iem.at mailto:pd-dev@lists.iem.at Subject: Re: [PD-dev] [PD] [PD-announce] Pd 0.513 test5 released Message-ID: <33E1D9D9-D44A-46DE-B598-B6DD3B49E6C4@iem.at mailto:33E1D9D9-D44A-46DE-B598-B6DD3B49E6C4@iem.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Am 3. November 2020 15:37:38 MEZ schrieb Dan Wilcox <danomatika@gmail.com mailto:danomatika@gmail.com>:
Main point is that the 64 bit build needs the 64 bit Tk.
sorry for being dumb, but: why?
Why not?
I agree that its probably preferred to have matching architectures between Pd-core and Pd-GUI, but is it a requirement?
I would say yes.
afaict the problem lucarda is describing comes mostly from the fact that wish.exe and pdfontloader.dll have different archs. (or is this what you were saying).
Yes, that's what I was saying. If previous versions of the windows 64 bit build worked fine with a 64 bit pdfontloader, then it's because Pd game with a 64 bit tk, so it follows that is what's needed in this case.
Dan Wilcox @danomatika http://twitter.com/danomatika danomatika.com http://danomatika.com robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
OK, recomiled with a 64-bit Wish... still runs OK in Wine, hoping it doesn't break anything out in the wild :)
http://msp.ucsd.edu/Software/pd-0.51-3test5-build2.msw.zip http://msp.ucsd.edu/Software/pd-0.51-3test5.windows-installer-build2.exe
There was no change to the source tree - I just recompiled the tcltk package which I stash elsewhere.
M On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 07:02:21PM +0100, Dan Wilcox wrote:
On Nov 3, 2020, at 6:04 PM, pd-dev-request@lists.iem.at wrote:
Message: 2 Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 18:03:59 +0100 From: IOhannes m zm??lnig <zmoelnig@iem.at mailto:zmoelnig@iem.at> To: pd-dev@lists.iem.at mailto:pd-dev@lists.iem.at Subject: Re: [PD-dev] [PD] [PD-announce] Pd 0.513 test5 released Message-ID: <33E1D9D9-D44A-46DE-B598-B6DD3B49E6C4@iem.at mailto:33E1D9D9-D44A-46DE-B598-B6DD3B49E6C4@iem.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Am 3. November 2020 15:37:38 MEZ schrieb Dan Wilcox <danomatika@gmail.com mailto:danomatika@gmail.com>:
Main point is that the 64 bit build needs the 64 bit Tk.
sorry for being dumb, but: why?
Why not?
I agree that its probably preferred to have matching architectures between Pd-core and Pd-GUI, but is it a requirement?
I would say yes.
afaict the problem lucarda is describing comes mostly from the fact that wish.exe and pdfontloader.dll have different archs. (or is this what you were saying).
Yes, that's what I was saying. If previous versions of the windows 64 bit build worked fine with a 64 bit pdfontloader, then it's because Pd game with a 64 bit tk, so it follows that is what's needed in this case.
Dan Wilcox @danomatika <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://twitter.com/danomatika__;!!Mih3wA!Sw6dTbE... > danomatika.com <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://danomatika.com/__;!!Mih3wA!Sw6dTbEZk-rg-X... > robotcowboy.com <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://robotcowboy.com/__;!!Mih3wA!Sw6dTbEZk-rg-... >
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev__;!!...
-
Christof Ressi -
Dan Wilcox -
Miller Puckette