If i'm not wrong there is a memory leak in that case ( http://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/pure-data/ci/master/tree/src/s_path.c#l18... ).
Yep, thanks. Fixing it now...
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 07:43:52PM +0100, Nicolas Danet wrote:
If i'm not wrong there is a memory leak in that case ( http://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/pure-data/ci/master/tree/src/s_path.c#l18... ).
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
On 03/21/2016 09:51 PM, Miller Puckette wrote:
Yep, thanks. Fixing it now...
since you seem to be in bug-squashing mode: there are about 100 more bugs waiting to be fixed :-) i've just submitted a patch that tackles about 30 of them...
https://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/patches/572/
many of the remaining known bugs are simply "logically dead code" [CWE561] and "unchecked return values" [CWE252], though there are still some memory leaks buried in g_template.c
gmsdr IOhannes
[CWE252] http://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/252.html [CWE561] http://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/561.html
-
IOhannes m zmölnig -
Miller Puckette -
Nicolas Danet