for the linux part of it, i could try to do some cleanup, although i
theres a big chunk of configure.in that can be wiped out..its gcc's job to keep track of all that fun arch stuff. --enable-optimize should pass right thru to -march, which will automagically enable the appropriate stuff like -mtune=, -msse2..so you can do an #if defined (__sse2__) or wahtever... instead of the -DDONNTUSESIMD and redundant arch flag stuff...
did i mention i love autoconf??
i could try cleaning it up, but not before getting past this:
d_dac.c: In function `dac_dsp': d_dac.c:60: error: `plus_perf8' undeclared (first use in this function)
c
theres a big chunk of configure.in that can be wiped out..its gcc's job to keep track of all that fun arch stuff. --enable-optimize should pass right thru to -march, which will automagically enable the appropriate stuff like -mtune=, -msse2..so you can do an #if defined (__sse2__) or wahtever... instead of the -DDONNTUSESIMD and redundant arch flag stuff...
.... well, DONTUSESIMD and -msse are two different things ... imo it should be possible to select msse without using the hardcoded optimizations ...
anyway, i'm currently rewriting pd's build system with automake/autoconf more or less from scratch ... i don't want to check it into the cvs before it's working on my linux machine (so probably tomorrow morning) ....
cheers ... tim
Tim Blechmann schrieb:
anyway, i'm currently rewriting pd's build system with automake/autoconf more or less from scratch ... i don't want to check it into the cvs before it's working on my linux machine (so probably tomorrow morning) ....
with libtool or without? this would help me a lot. people are already asking about pure-data at cygwin. at cygwin you would get a "gold star" for that: http://cygwin.com/goldstars/
-
ix -
Reini Urban -
Tim Blechmann