On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Frank Barknecht wrote:

If you use the route-approach, you can use settable routes (as an abstraction like sroute.pd in [list]-abs). But actually I have no idea why a settable receive should be necessary anyway? :)

One example is the GFDP (GridFlow Documentation Project), which uses settable receives because it uses receive-symbols that are local to the toplevel patch they are in (an intermediate between global and the ordinary local). This value has to be output by an object, so it cannot appear directly in an [r] box, and the GFDP doesn't use that much dynamic patching...

_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: +1.514.383.3801