Hello,
Is the code above good < https://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/pure-data/ci/master/tree/src/d_arithmeti... >?
over_perform / d_arithmetic.c / line 1454
...
t_sample g = *in2++; *out++ = (g ? *in1++ / g : 0);
...
AFAIK the in1 pointer is not incremented if the content of in2 is zero.
Whereas the over_perf8 method increments it. So i guess that there is something wrong.
Sure enough. Fixed in git repo now.
thanks Miller
On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 02:53:18PM +0100, Nicolas Danet wrote:
Hello,
Is the code above good < https://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/pure-data/ci/master/tree/src/d_arithmeti... >?
over_perform / d_arithmetic.c / line 1454
...
t_sample g = *in2++; *out++ = (g ? *in1++ / g : 0);
...
AFAIK the in1 pointer is not incremented if the content of in2 is zero.
Whereas the over_perf8 method increments it. So i guess that there is something wrong.
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
-
Miller Puckette -
Nicolas Danet