(Please don't hijack threads, make a new one. ...and yes, I did this recently and I should not have. 🙈)
On Oct 10, 2024, at 7:31 PM, pd-dev-request@lists.iem.at wrote:
Message: 4 Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 14:30:59 -0300 From: Alexandre <porres@gmail.com mailto:porres@gmail.com> Subject: [PD-dev] Re: #include "config.h" in m_private_utils.h needed? To: Miller Puckette <mpuckette@cloud.ucsd.edu mailto:mpuckette@cloud.ucsd.edu> Cc: pd-dev@lists.iem.at mailto:pd-dev@lists.iem.at Message-ID: <CAEAsFmj5aEgXGhHBdyC12Kj=6him0t0v9UitTZu0+gwZvi-MSw@mail.gmail.com mailto:CAEAsFmj5aEgXGhHBdyC12Kj=6him0t0v9UitTZu0+gwZvi-MSw@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000917c80062422bcef"
Em qui., 10 de out. de 2024 Ã s 13:01, Miller Puckette < mpuckette@cloud.ucsd.edu mailto:mpuckette@cloud.ucsd.edu> escreveu:
OK, if nobody objects I'll cut out the offending lines and call it 0.55-2test1.
I've been in private conversation with Shahrokh about fixing some bugs in expr and improving it a bit. See if he has anything to contribute now in the very short term.
Now for my so called "objection". Well, I just have an issue that I'd like to bring to your attention :) which is this fix for [sigmund~] --> https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2445 and it's actually something we also have to fix in the documentation, and that I don't really understand how it works. I think it'd be good to also take care of this for 0.55-2
cheers
-------- Dan Wilcox danomatika.com http://danomatika.com/ robotcowboy.com http://robotcowboy.com/
I responded to the -nharmonics PR... I think things are all right the way they are, at least for now.
But as to documentation: the second argument to the nharmonics message can default to zero, but as a creation flag it needs both - an inconsistency but not a bug as I see it.
cheers
M
On 10/10/24 6:46 PM, Dan Wilcox wrote:
(Please don't hijack threads, make a new one. ...and yes, I did this recently and I should not have. 🙈)
On Oct 10, 2024, at 7:31 PM, pd-dev-request@lists.iem.at wrote:
Message: 4 Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 14:30:59 -0300 From: Alexandre porres@gmail.com Subject: [PD-dev] Re: #include "config.h" in m_private_utils.h needed? To: Miller Puckette mpuckette@cloud.ucsd.edu Cc:pd-dev@lists.iem.at Message-ID: CAEAsFmj5aEgXGhHBdyC12Kj=6him0t0v9UitTZu0+gwZvi-MSw@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000917c80062422bcef"
Em qui., 10 de out. de 2024 Ã s 13:01, Miller Puckette < mpuckette@cloud.ucsd.edu> escreveu:
OK, if nobody objects I'll cut out the offending lines and call it 0.55-2test1.
I've been in private conversation with Shahrokh about fixing some bugs in expr and improving it a bit. See if he has anything to contribute now in the very short term.
Now for my so called "objection". Well, I just have an issue that I'd like to bring to your attention :) Â which is this fix for [sigmund~] --> https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2445 https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2445__;!!Mih3wA!CKKRVEq1ZVV8gCiG49b9LLK0y5Hs0TVQhUlsYFp91ghUxdRTHuAxzUL1LnUHfeJJQxYtuCN3iKZtk_I$and it's actually something we also have to fix in the documentation, and that I don't really understand how it works. I think it'd be good to also take care of this for 0.55-2
cheers
Dan Wilcox danomatika.com https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://danomatika.com__;!!Mih3wA!CKKRVEq1ZVV8gCiG49b9LLK0y5Hs0TVQhUlsYFp91ghUxdRTHuAxzUL1LnUHfeJJQxYtuCN3DnLVVOw$ robotcowboy.com https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://robotcowboy.com__;!!Mih3wA!CKKRVEq1ZVV8gCiG49b9LLK0y5Hs0TVQhUlsYFp91ghUxdRTHuAxzUL1LnUHfeJJQxYtuCN3kXUnnr0$
pd-dev@lists.iem.at - the Pd developers' mailinglist https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/pd-dev@list...
I responded back, I see issues as giving 2 args generates an error, and I also need to know what is the 2nd argument about to document it.
Em sex., 11 de out. de 2024 Ã s 09:51, Miller Puckette < mpuckette@cloud.ucsd.edu> escreveu:
I responded to the -nharmonics PR... I think things are all right the way they are, at least for now.
But as to documentation: the second argument to the nharmonics message can default to zero, but as a creation flag it needs both - an inconsistency but not a bug as I see it.
cheers
M
On 10/10/24 6:46 PM, Dan Wilcox wrote:
(Please don't hijack threads, make a new one. ...and yes, I did this recently and I should not have. 🙈)
On Oct 10, 2024, at 7:31 PM, pd-dev-request@lists.iem.at wrote:
Message: 4 Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 14:30:59 -0300 From: Alexandre porres@gmail.com Subject: [PD-dev] Re: #include "config.h" in m_private_utils.h needed? To: Miller Puckette mpuckette@cloud.ucsd.edu Cc:pd-dev@lists.iem.at Message-ID: CAEAsFmj5aEgXGhHBdyC12Kj=6him0t0v9UitTZu0+gwZvi-MSw@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000917c80062422bcef"
Em qui., 10 de out. de 2024 Ã s 13:01, Miller Puckette < mpuckette@cloud.ucsd.edu> escreveu:
OK, if nobody objects I'll cut out the offending lines and call it 0.55-2test1.
I've been in private conversation with Shahrokh about fixing some bugs
in
expr and improving it a bit. See if he has anything to contribute now in the very short term.
Now for my so called "objection". Well, I just have an issue that I'd like to bring to your attention :) which is this fix for [sigmund~] --> https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2445 <
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/2445...
it's actually something we also have to fix in the documentation, and that I don't really understand how it works. I think it'd be good to also take care of this for 0.55-2
cheers
Dan Wilcox danomatika.com <
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://danomatika.com__;!!Mih3wA!CKKRVEq1ZVV8gCi...
robotcowboy.com <
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://robotcowboy.com__;!!Mih3wA!CKKRVEq1ZVV8gC...
pd-dev@lists.iem.at - the Pd developers' mailinglist
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/pd-dev@list...
pd-dev@lists.iem.at - the Pd developers' mailinglist
https://lists.iem.at/hyperkitty/list/pd-dev@lists.iem.at/message/GSCP37HPKHK...