Bugs item #2005761, was opened at 2008-06-29 02:31 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lukeiannini You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=2005761...
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: pd-extended Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: frey (freynz) Assigned to: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave) Summary: ui performance bad on 0.40.3-extended
Initial Comment: In the UI on MacOSX/Intel (and probably other platforms), opening a patch, and dragging objects around in a patch, is significantly slower in Pd-0.40.3-extended than in 0.40.2-vanilla.
This problem exists back to at least the 2008-01-08 autobuild.
Attached patches demonstrate the problem. Open up ui-slowness-test.pd. On 0.40.2-vanilla, this loads quickly. on 0.40.3-extended, there's a noticeable delay on load.
Now select all objects and drag. On 0.40.2-vanilla the performance is bad but not atrocious. on 0.40.3-extended, the performance is atrocious.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Luke Iannini (lukeiannini) Date: 2008-07-03 01:32
Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1541432 Originator: NO
Hello, The main issue affecting me has been the load times, since I have a very deeply GOP'd patch suite (16 instances of one module) that currently takes over 15 minutes to open. Tonight I have benchmarked a selection of Pd-E releases with just one GOP-heavy module of this suite to try to narrow down when this began.
Here are the results, from clicking off the entered object text to appearance of the GOP GUI:
Pd 0.41-4 21 secs Pd-E 20080622 85 secs Pd-E 20080601 110 secs Pd-E 20080528 91 secs Pd-E 20080522 108 Pd-E 20080518 29 secs Pd-E 20080418 32 secs Pd-E 20080110 34 secs
So, it seems that the breaking point was between 5-18 and 5-22, which seems about right to me. I'm out of energy tonight, but tomorrow I'll check the logs to see what changed in those 3 days.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2008-06-30 09:04
Message: Logged In: NO
This problem is also on Windows XP sp2
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave) Date: 2008-06-29 06:56
Message: Logged In: YES user_id=27104 Originator: NO
which hardware? be as specific as possible please. Also, how much of a delay is there for opening?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: frey (freynz) Date: 2008-06-29 05:32
Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1772500 Originator: YES
i'm on OSX 10.4.11/Intel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: frey (freynz) Date: 2008-06-29 05:32
Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1772500 Originator: YES
i just tried it without preferences or .pdrc file, and got the same thing.
.. and on 0.41.4-vanilla the performance is exactly the same as 0.40.2-vanilla.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave) Date: 2008-06-29 05:15
Message: Logged In: YES user_id=27104 Originator: NO
Here is more from an old G4:
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2007-11/056368.html http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2007-11/056380.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave) Date: 2008-06-29 05:12
Message: Logged In: YES user_id=27104 Originator: NO
It seems there was a similar report a while back, but with no example patch:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1839447&gr...
"when opening a patch, the screen takes a little while to show--first all the objects show up, then after almost 1/2 second the connections show. after doing something--eg hitting cmd-s, it takes some time for the system to be ready for the next action: hitting eg cmd-1 or cmd-e directly doesn't do anything. wait a second, and it works again. this was not the case in earlier autobuilds (march this year). pd ext-40-03 recent autobuilds on osx 10.4.x (both on .8 and on recently upgraded .10)"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment By: Hans-Christoph Steiner (eighthave) Date: 2008-06-29 05:07
Message: Logged In: YES user_id=27104 Originator: NO
Using this example patch with Pd-extended 0.40.3-extended-20080627 on my 3rd gen MacBook Pro running Mac OS X 10.4.11/Intel, there is no noticable difference in load time when compared to Pd 0.41-4. It is slower for dragging, so I'll look into that. But it is far from atrocious on my machine it is quite usable, just a bit of a lag makes it feel somewhat heavy.
I am using the default preferences. Have you tried removing your prefereneces? Also what version of Mac OS X are you on?
I'll test on older G4 today.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=478070&aid=2005761...
-
SourceForge.net