PS: there's also some more of my PRs which i would like to draw special attention to (for inclusion with Pd-0.54)
To follow up, it would be great if Pd 0.54 could include my scheduler fixes/improvements:
https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/1756
It has been tested by several people on all major operating systems and I have been using it myself in production since autumn 2022.
---
Two trivial PRs:
Improve [pack] reentrancy handling: https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/1762/files
Make openpanel/savepanel dialogs window modal https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/764
---
The following PRs have been lingering for 3-4 years (!) now, although they seem rather uncontroversial and pretty useful to me.
"-open-with-args" command line option https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/1064
Clone improvements https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/1069
"goprect" message https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/627
Christof
On 03.06.2023 23:37, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
On 6/3/23 20:02, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
Hi, with pd 0.54-0 round the corner, what is still preventing us from shipping double precision pd downloads?
from my side: https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/1605
it would be nice if this could be merged for the 0.54 release¹
in the meantime, i've instructed our CI to also produce a (signed) DMG for double-precision Pds. i'll try to also generate Windows installers for sinlge/double precision (and 32bit/64bit pointers).
so it should be straightforward for miller to publish useable files fordouble precision.
but i really think that #1605 should be applied first.
fmdsa IOhannes
PS: there's also some more of my PRs which i would like to draw special attention to (for inclusion with Pd-0.54)
others like #1929 or #1766 would of course be nice to have as well (as are most of my PRs ;-))
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev