So is it just in there so that you can compile it in if you feel like changing the makefile, or why is d_fft_fftsg.c included in the source?<div><br></div><div>Miller, why not use OOURA instead of Maynard, now that we know it is faster and more versatile? I could have sworn that about 1 year ago, pd was using the OOURA algorithm.</div>
<div><br></div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Rich E <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:reakinator@gmail.com">reakinator@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Hi all,<div><br></div><div>Is the OOURA fft algorithm (d_fft_fftsg.c) ever used in pd? I can&#39;t really tell from the makefile (granted, I don&#39;t really know how to use the autotools system), but I cannot see the file ever compiled into pd during the make.</div>

<div><br></div><div>I though that OOURA was the fastest and most flexible fft algorithm included in pd..</div><div><br></div><div>cheers,</div><div>Rich</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>