Hallo, Tim Blechmann hat gesagt: // Tim Blechmann wrote:
I guess, I'd second this. If I use abstractions in a patch, then I see these as being something rather static. They reside in the filesystem and a change of one abstraction should mean a change in all other instances, too. Subpatches however, especially those names with $0,
yes and no ... for most applications i'm using abstractions with $X arguments ... but sometimes i want to have abstractions with slightly different behaviour related to the arguments ...
Yes, I can understand this, and I'd like Pd to be as flexible as possible, too. However I can only think of one occasion, where changing things inside a [pd $0-something] is not enough: Changing the number of inlets and outlets. Everything else is possible to do inside a named canvas created through subpatching, or isn't it?
Ciao