Sorry, my fault I guess, i didn't test with -stderr...
I can try to fix, but not before the end of the week.


Le lun. 23 août 2021 à 12:53, Christof Ressi <info@christofressi.com> a écrit :

Hi,

in this commit, "print_anything()" and "print_list()" now (ab)uses the new "startlogpost()" function for printing individual pd atoms. However, for "-stderr" and custom printhooks this will accidentally print "verbose(2) " before each atom.

I would suggest to add another function "logatom()" - analogous to "postatom()" - which would only print the atom (without a newline) and omit the "verbose(N) " header.

Christof

On 23.08.2021 10:50, Roman Haefeli wrote:
Hi

Since f16dd5ec34 (I believe) everything printed to stderr is garbled.
For instance, when doing:

[list a b 12(
|
[print]

in 'pd -stderr', I get:

~~~
verbose(2): print: listverbose(2):  averbose(2):  bverbose(2):  12
~~~

Without '-stderr', the print output looks fine in the Pd console.

Roman

_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@lists.iem.at
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@lists.iem.at
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev