On Sep 12, 2007, at 4:07 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Sounds good, how about downcasing while you are at it, so we have it more standardized.
i don't see a real benefit from it. but then: why not? (and finally: since Framestein is really abandoned for some years, i would remove it from the /trunk/ anyhow and keep it living in "/ tags/framestein/"
Plus, what about adding Gem back to the main pure-data repository?
why?
- everything else is in that repository - makes for one checkout for everything - makes it easy to make branches and tags for the whole shebang - we are one big happy family :D
All these changes will cause major breakage to the Pd-extended build system, anyone want to help fix it? :D
(please skip to the bottom if you don't want to read that again)
the joys of monolithic build-systems...
however, once we have moved to SVN i would like to make an experimental branch of pd-extended to re-work the entire build- system into small (managable) pieces that are modular and survive directory re-structuring. i know that you are not really interested in that, but probably others are :-)
I am all for improving things, but it seems that this would need to happen before reorganizing the repository. Otherwise we are without pd-extended builds until it happens. That's not why I spent all my free time one summer building the Pd-extended and the auto-build farm. Switching to SVN is not a good enough reason for major breakage.
.hc
fmg.ad IOhannes
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----
I have the audacity to believe that peoples everywhere can have three meals a day for their bodies, education and culture for their minds, and dignity, equality and freedom for their spirits. - Martin Luther King, Jr.