'sigvec' is declared as t_int ** and is used in dsp_addv(chance_perform, n_sig, (t_int *)sigvec);dsp_addv wants "t_int *" (= an array of t_int), not "t_int **", so sigvec must be "t_int *" as well. Consequently, variables must be cast to "t_int", not "t_int *", when assigning to the array.
I tried everything and was able to remove the warning by matching things up at one pointDon't just try to get rid of warnings by doing random things until they go away. Instead, try to understand them and see if they might point to an actual mistake in your code (as it is the case here).
---
As a side note: you don't necessarily need to use dsp_addv() for objects with variable inputs/outputs, you can just as well store the signal buffers (t_sample *) in an array (t_sample **) in your object.
Both methods are fine, it's just a matter of preference.
Christof
Em qua., 23 de fev. de 2022 às 06:21, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig@iem.at> escreveu:
that is just a bug in your code.
it should read:
```
int nblock = sp[0]->s_n;
```
If I do that I get this similar warning
warning: incompatible integer to pointer conversion assigning
to 't_int *' (aka 'long *') from 'int' [-Wint-conversion]
sigvec[n_sig - 1] = nblock; // block size (n)
this happens here => https://github.com/porres/pd-else/blob/master/Classes/Source/chance~.c#L79
'sigvec' is declared as t_int ** and is used in dsp_addv(chance_perform, n_sig, (t_int *)sigvec);
I tried everything and was able to remove the warning by matching things up at one point, I don't remember exactly what I did, but the problem is that the object would blow up Pd when DSP was on, so no good... So yeah, the solution to remove this warning doesn't seem to be trivial and is way over my head.
I'd really like to have no warnings at all as I believe this is some proof the code is robust, but that's just an assumption from someone who's not a real programmer.
This object has a variable number of signal outlets and I don't remember where I copied this structure from (maybe some object in Cyclone?). Perhaps I have to adopt a whole new strategy so if someone can point me to some other code out there as a reference I'd appreciate it.
thanks
_______________________________________________ Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@lists.iem.at https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev