On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 07:30 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Matt Barber hat gesagt: // Matt Barber wrote:
Getting rid of cyclone's pow~ would break all of the patches that rely on cyclone's pow~, and would also make it harder to import Max/MSP patches. Removing it is not a solution.
Okay. But I don't see why something that is a rather obvious breach of style should be allowed to bully the rest of the application. I have never used Max/MSP, but it seems like its (and cyclone's) [pow~] is really something more like an [exp~] with a changeable base.
Cyclone's overriding is pretty important for importing Max files. Without it I wouldn't have been able to port the RTC library that fast.
now, that pd has its own [pow~], why not just using that? yeah, it takes a bit more time to write the abstractions, but then they are more vanilla friendly.
roman
___________________________________________________________ Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: http://mail.yahoo.de