Em ter., 17 de jan. de 2023 às 14:54, Miller Puckette <msp@ucsd.edu> escreveu:
The trouble with multichannel osc~ (etc.) is to figure out how to distribute
messages setting frequency and phase, etc., to the individual copies.

not sure of the internal challenge, but I would intuitively think of a list setting frequencies in this case (might be harder in other cases).
 
 
In any case, I'd consider adding the possibility for the clone object to
take the name of a primitive object (as opposed to a subpatch) - IF it's
possible to design it well and simply. 

hmmm, I actually had thought about that before this multichannel thing for easilly creating a bank of oscillators, for instance. It could be a way for us to also create 'mc.' versions. 
 
I wouldn't want to invent separate "mc~" versions of everything - that would be a nightmare.

+1
 
cheers