> From: Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans@at.or.at>
> To: pd-dev@iem.at
> Cc:
> Sent: Saturday, October 20, 2012 1:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [PD-dev] converting OSCx to a template library
>
> On 10/20/2012 11:56 AM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>> On 10/20/2012 04:17 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd happily ditch it if there was a drop in replacement.  For
> example, I've
>>> had many students come to me with the most popular
> Processing<-->  Pd starter
>>> patch, and its based on oscx.  If it wasn't include, that patch
> would not work
>>> at all.  So buggy but working is still better than not at all.
>>
>> so what is wrong with my patches? they _are_ drop-in replacements.
>>
>> if those students use PdX (with [initbang]) one could even writen
> [OSCroute]
>> wrapper.
>
> I don't know if anything is wrong with them or not, or whether they are
> fully
> compatible or not.  I can't take on the maintenance of any more libraries,
> so
> I'm not going to test them.  I encourage you to take it on if you think its
> important.  oscx is there and already included, that's my point.

Isn't he just fixing the existing library?

>
> .hc
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-dev mailing list
> Pd-dev@iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
>