On 02/28/2012 10:06 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> On 2012-02-28 16:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> > Yes, I object. Like I said in the bug tracker and this thread, I think
> > the offset should either remain the same or be the same as the rest.
>
> may i ask why? what makes "4" better than "3"?

+4 already there.  +3 an incompatible change that does not fix things.

.hc