If you want to set that up and manage it, go for it! :D Please take that over, then we can take the bug reports out of the tracker. It would be good to have a little howto on how to submit pdpedia bugs.
.hc
On Dec 24, 2007, at 8:40 AM, marius schebella wrote:
I have not worked with the bug tracker before, and I think for me it would be easier to use a todo page on the wiki itself, plus the pd-mailing lists. marius.
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Of course that is just my view. I am very able to accept the views of others and I won't veto against pd.info, pdpedia, pd-list etc. bugs, but changes like that *must be discussed* here first, not just decided by one person alone.
Because the pure-data is setup, it works, and people know how to use it. Verbose bug reports are always useful, for pdpedia and anything. If anyone wants to set up another bug tracker for pdpedia, I won't stop them.
I don't want to ruin christmas, and as the votes are now 2:1 in favour of pdpedia bugs on SF, it's okay with me as it is now. But I'd like to repeat my main point: Please inform other admins about such changes in the future and don't decide this just on your own. It's a community bug tracker.
Ciao
PD-dev mailing list PD-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----
As we enjoy great advantages from inventions of others, we should be glad of an opportunity to serve others by any invention of ours; and this we should do freely and generously. - Benjamin Franklin