On Mar 19, 2018, at 10:49 PM, Alex <x37v.alex@gmail.com> wrote:Thanks for the info Dan!using my cmake setup in the jit_expr project I was able to build just now for 10.9 but no lower, going below 10.9 didn't allow it to find the std::shared_ptrmaybe I can get lower somehow? Either way, this should be more useful for more people :)On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 2:15 PM, Dan Wilcox <danomatika@gmail.com> wrote:Also, if you're targeting C++11, I think you'll have to use a min of at least 10.7 (from https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7482026/can-i- ).use-the-latest-features-of- c11-in-xcode-4-or-osx-lion One thing we've noticed is that Pd builds on my machine running 10.13 don't seems to work on 10.6-10.7 systems, so the deployment target is really a suggestion at best. You'll have to do some testing but it's hard to hit *everyone* and honestly the vast majority of users fall within the newest to maybe 3 versions before anyway (ie. 10.10 - 10.13 now).For plain C/C++, you can have a relatively old deployment target. It's really more important for macOS app development using the Apple frameworks ie. stuff like the changes from QT to AVFoundation, etc.On Mar 19, 2018, at 10:07 PM, Dan Wilcox <danomatika@gmail.com> wrote:The compiler builds for the current system by default. You have to set the min deployment target when building.Add this flag to you makefile: --mmacosx-version-min=10.6 The current version for Pd is 10.6 which is the first version that supported i386 (ie. Intel processors).On Mar 19, 2018, at 12:00 PM, pd-dev-request@lists.iem.at wrote:From: Miller Puckette <msp@ucsd.edu>
To: Alex <x37v.alex@gmail.com>
Cc: pd-dev <pd-dev@lists.iem.at>
Subject: Re: [PD-dev] Mac SDK version for externals
Message-ID: <20180319015755.GY7620@elroy.localdomain >
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
This is a very interesting and useful question.
At the outset of PD I only worried about having it run on the "current"
platforms: Redhat 5.2, Windows 95, and when it arrived, MacOS 10.2. Older
platforms weren't important.
Since then I've tried to keep back compatibility to whatever those bleeding-edge
OSes were, because I assume people can't always afford machine upgrades. But
I haven't tried to extend Pd (Or "extra" objects) backward past the original
dates.
At the moment I can only compile back to OSX 10.5 (PPC) and Windows XP; I
don't have real or virtual machines that go back further.
So my suggestion would be: make it work on today's OSes, and try to keep it
alive on them, but don't worry too hard about older ones. I don't think I'm
ever going to be tempted to compile Pd for Windows 3.1.
cheers
Miller