On May 17, 2008, at 12:32 PM, Rich E wrote:

On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Miller Puckette <mpuckett@imusic1.ucsd.edu> wrote:
I rather doubt this can relly help given the way Pd uses Tcl/Tk.
(I still have a pet idea on the other hand of simply parsing the TCL code
and passing it to GTK :)

All those in favor of a GTK GUI for pd say I.

Honestly, Tcl/Tk does a much better job than GTK on Mac OS X and maybe Windows too. GTK apps look like, well, GTK apps. Tcl/Tk apps can be made to be quite native in feel. Tcl/Tk's big lack right now is native GNOME (and maybe KDE?) panels. I've looked for a way to use native GNOME open/save panels, but I haven't found it yet. Anyone know of a way?

.hc

IIIIIII!

rich.

cheers
M

On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 05:26:00PM -0500, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> Now that I have discovered this bytecode caching feature, I am
> curious if the changes I made have made any performance differences.
> Also, matju mentioned that the bytecode caching probably works better
> if reusing procs, so it could make sense to have sys_vgui calls use
> Tcl procs, so that the bytecode gets reused.
>
> I was also thinking that perhaps sys_vgui communications could use
> Tcl_Obj references instead of sending whole lines of Tcl, but that
> might get overly complicated.
>
> .hc
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>
> http://at.or.at/hans/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> PD-dev mailing list
> PD-dev@iem.at
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev

_______________________________________________
PD-dev mailing list
PD-dev@iem.at
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev