28 Feb
2012
28 Feb
'12
4:03 p.m.
Yes, I object. Like I said in the bug tracker and this thread, I think the offset should either remain the same or be the same as the rest.
.hc
On 02/28/2012 04:45 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
trying to take the heat out of this:
my patch suggested to change the loglevel offset from "+4" to "+3". is there anything speaking against this specific change?
(it seems that all discussion is centered around the question whether there should be an offset at all, rather than how big it should be)
fgmasdr IOhannes
Pd-dev mailing list Pd-dev@iem.at http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev