On Sep 20, 2017, at 9:46 AM, Miller Puckette <msp@ucsd.edu> wrote:Inlets&outlets are 2 pixels on linux and windows. It's a Tcl/Tk rendering
inconsistency that makes inlets (if I remember correctly) appear as 3-pix-high
rectangles with empty centers. Extended (which was primarily developed on a
Mac) took this as the 'preferred' look and altered outlets to look like inlets
(unlike the original design).
Which is better is a matter of judgement - but if inlets/outlets are grown
to 3 pixel, then boxes should get another 2 pix of height. I'd suggest making
this a "preference", perhaps selectable in the "font size" window.
cheers
Miller
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 03:23:49PM +0200, Dan Wilcox wrote:It's on the list. I have the sizing from extended mostly working which fixes the object & atom sizing issues we're seeing with 0.48.On Sep 18, 2017, at 7:39 PM, Kevin Haywood <khaywood@ucsd.edu> wrote:
If you’re considering cleaning up things of this nature, then I’d add that outlets currently only extend two pixels into objects, messages, etc., whereas inlets extend 3 (and are therefore much easier to see). This is the case on macOS, at least.
If this was by design, then please ignore : )
Cheers,
KevinOn Sep 18, 2017, at 2:35 AM, Dan Wilcox <danomatika@gmail.com<mailto:danomatika@gmail.com>> wrote:
So it would be fine to use the same vert sizing as object boxes? I have that now in some testing and it looks good, especially for symbols. Maybe I'm too picky with the details :)On Sep 18, 2017, at 12:12 AM, Miller Puckette <msp@ucsd.edu<mailto:msp@ucsd.edu>> wrote:
I think there's only a very stupid, short-sighted reason: since numbers
never have descenders, it wasn't necessary to add a pixel of whitespace
underneath the rendered string. I was intent on reducing the size of
everything to its absolute minimum.
I was forgetting about (or maybe not anticipating) "symbol" boxes - it's
easy to make symbol box text collide with the box's outlet. And "|"
characters can hit the bottom edge of the box even away from the outlet.
cheers
Miller
On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 11:10:50PM +0200, Dan Wilcox wrote:Is there a reason why atoms and slightly shorter in height than object boxes, at least on macOS?
I'm not asking for the technical reason, as I know in the code why this is, but more the conceptual reason, or is it a bug?
--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/> <http://danomatika.com/<http://danomatika.com/>>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/> <http://robotcowboy.com/<http://robotcowboy.com/>>_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@lists.iem.at <mailto:Pd-dev@lists.iem.at>
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev <https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev>
--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>
_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@lists.iem.at <mailto:Pd-dev@lists.iem.at>
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev <https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev>
--------
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com/>
robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com/>_______________________________________________
Pd-dev mailing list
Pd-dev@lists.iem.at
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-dev